
When I was younger I had a great love for randomness. One of the things I loved to do was create charts for the random creation of characters, stories, treasures, and in this case, planets to be used with my Starfaring game. The following chart is from 1976. It made perfect sense to me at the time, but may not be quite so coherent now. This is just the planet creation section of a complete SF Story Writing set of random tables—I’m not giving you the whole chart because I think I’ve lost a good part of it, but all the planetary creation stuff is still here.
Roll 2D6 to create an alien world. (This chart is not weighted for probability of planets out there—there is a high probability that the majority of planets are gas giants, but we like earth-like worlds a lot better for creating stories.)
Number rolled World Type
5-9 Earth like (Men can live on it without special gear)
2 Venus like (super hot, high pressure)
3-4 Mars like (cold, thin atmosphere, low gravity
10 Gas giant (like Jupiter)
11 Mercury-Luna like
12 Double planet
Type 1 Earth-like planets support life on a roll of 2-11. 12 no life. Planets aren’t very interesting if they’re completely dead.
Roll 2D6
Number rolled Life Status
2-7 Intelligent life
Roll 2D6
Number rolled Quantity
2-3 More than 1 intelligent race. Roll 2D6. On 7 let there be an alien race from space on the world in addition to natives.
4-12 Only 1 intelligent race.
8-12 Non-sentient creatures
Roll 2D6 for general geography of planet
Number rolled World physiology and climate
2-4 Ocean world with islands
5-8 Earth normal
9-10 Super tropical—water never freezes. No polar ice caps.
11-12 Desert world—water scarce
Roll odd or even
Odd World is a hot dry desert
Even World is a cold dry desert
Gravity: Roll 2D6
The world’s gravity compared to Earth is determined by the following formula. Gravity = .21D – 1/D. (Thus if D were 8, the gravity would be 1.555 times Earth’s normal gravity which would be equal to 1.000)
Type 2 Venus-like worlds support life on a roll of 2-3. On 4-12, it is just an inferno hell world.
Roll odd or even
Odd—the world is cloud-covered with atmosphere mostly carbon-dioxide and nitrogen.
Even—the world is covered with a chlorine—methane atmosphere.
Gravity is determined by the same formula as Earth. Gravity = .21D – 1/D.
Type 3 Mars-like worlds support life on a roll of 2-5. If life is present, use the Life chart under earth-like worlds to determine type, frequency, and variety.
Roll 2D6 for general geography of planet
Number rolled Geography
5-9 Mars normal, cold, cratered, thin atmosphere.
3, 4, 10, 11 Volcanically active—warm, sulfunous, liquid water
2, 12 Very cold, fronzen atmosphere,
Gravity determined by this formula. Gravity = .063D + 1d*2. Thus if D were 8, the gravity of this world would be 0.5055 earth normal.
Type 4 Gas giant worlds support life on a roll of 6-8.
Roll 2D6 for general geography of planet
Number rolled Geography
7-9 Like Jupiter
10-12 Like Saturn (spectacular ring system)
2-6 Like Uranus (huge dense iceball)
Roll 2D6 for number of moons around the gas giant. Doubles add and roll over.
Gravity is determined by the formula Gravity = .8D + 6/D. Thus a roll on 2D6 of 8 would yield a gravity of 7.15 Earth normal gravity.
Type 5 Mercury-Luna planets are small rocky balls with no atmosphere. If they are close to their star, they are very hot. If they are distant, they are very cold. If they are in the Life Zone of the star (defined as a place where liquid water could exist) they are hot on the day side and cold on the night side.
Roll 2D6 for life. On a roll of 2, there is life, but it is alien life that came to mine or otherwise exploit the planet’s resources.
Gravity is determined by the formula Gravity = .05D Thus a roll of 8 would yield a surface gravity of 0.4 earth normal.
Type 6 worlds are double planet systems. Earth and its moon, Luna, is a double planet system, but Mars with its moons of Phobos and Deimos is not.
Roll 2D6 to determine the type of double planet. Determine the likelihood of life on each world by using the formulas above.
Roll 2D6 for general geography of planet
Number rolled System Structure
2 Type 1 & Type 1 (twin earths)
3 Type 1 & Type 2 (Earth and Venus)
4 Type 1 & Type 3 (Earth and Mars)
5 Type 1 & Type 4 (Earth and Jupiter)
6 Type 1 & Type 5 (Earth and Luna)
7 Type 2 & Type 2 (twin Venuses)
8 Type 2 & Type 3 (Venus and Mars)
9 Type 2 & Type 4 (Venus and Jupiter)
10 Type 2 & Type 5 (Venus and Luna)
11 Type 4 &Types 4 and 5
12 Type 5 & Type 5 (two Moon-sized worlds)
Not all combinations have been covered as 11 numbers doesn’t give me enough possibilities, but the most likely are covered.

In retyping this world creation table I see things I originally ignored, such as how many planets are in each star system and what order they are in. You will have to determine such things for yourself. Star types based on mass are O, B, A, F, G, K, and M, and a logical way of determining how many planets each type would have is to give the more massive stars more planets. You could use this chart:
Star Type Number of D6 to roll for number of planets
O 7
B 6
A 5
F 4
G 3
K 2
M 1
Then for planet types around the star you would roll up each one starting with the closest and working your way out. Recent discoveries of extra-solar planets have shown that they don’t have to be in any particular sequence of sizes or types. Gas giants can be in tight orbits. Small rocky planets can be very distant. Anything is possible out there in the galaxy.
End of charts.
If you agree with my system of extrasolar planetary creation, leave a comment. If you think I need a few more semesters of astronomy, you can say that too. If you have ever created a star system and would like to describe your methods, please chime in.
end
This blog is all about things that entertain me. One of the things that entertains me right now is digging through my old books and papers that I wrote years ago, and putting them up on the internet. Here’s one that I found this afternoon (May 20).
This is another essay from the vaults, something I wrote 36 years ago, and then just put away. I found it in an envelope which contains pages and pages of random sci-fi environment creating rules for use with my Starfaring game. I may post some of that here, too. I don’t know why I wrote this–certainly there is nothing at all revolutionary or original in my contention that the galaxy is full of all kinds of alien life and intelligence. Still, it shows where my head was at back in 1976. To some degree, my head is still in the same optimistic place. While writers like Von Daniken and Temple have been thoroughly disproved by later, more skeptical analysis, one should remember that they presented their own theories. Imaginative people form wild theories from the evidence they see. Wild theories are usually, but not always, wrong. People like to simplify things, but the truth is, things are more complicated than they seem. And I like to be hopeful about such things.
Wikipedia tells me that there are at least 104 known star systems with associated planets. One sunlike star, HD10180, has been shown to have at least 7 planets. While most of the extrasolar planets found so far have been giants the size of Jupiter or larger, several earthlike planets have been found, including one only 6 times as large as the earth and with a lot of water in the atmosphere. Considering that no extrasolar planets had actually been found in 1976 when I wrote this essay, I’d say that young Ken was remarkably prescient in his claims. 🙂
***************************************************************************

The front cover for my second game design. Starfaring was heavily influenced by Star Trek, but it contained most of my personal beliefs about alien life in the galaxy.
The joy of science fiction is that one can ask what if? and then set the parameters for oneself. This explains how and why so many different interstellar wargames have sprung up in the last three years. Having just tried my own hand in thet particular area (Starfaring–Flying Buffalo–$6.00) I felt it might be interesting for both players and posibly other game designers if I could briefly go over some basic ideas that I would like to see hold true in astronomy.
For several years there has been a lot of excitement in scientific circles about the possibilities of life elsewhere in the galaxy. Carl Sagan has been the leading scientific proponent of extra-terrestrial intelligent life, and Erich von Daniken has been the leading non-scientific supporter. Whether one believes in ancient astronauts or not, there is a good deal of evidence that the Earth has been visited by star-traveling races in the past. (See Robert Temple’s scholarly book THE SIRIUS MYSTERY.) And, though Project Ozma is a thing of the past, radio astronomers all over the world are still quietly listening for that first signal that will tell us we are not alone.

Sagan was famous for mixing hard science with sense of wonder imagination.
However, everyone is much too pessimistic and narrow-minded about things just at present. Now that we know that stars and planets are formed by the same process of gravity condensation, it seems just too faint-hearted to assume that solar systems are galactic rarities. Nor does it seem entirely reasonable to limit them to Sol-type stars. From blue giants to red dwarves, all stars should be expected to be companioned by planetary systems. Though about half the stars in our galaxy are multiple star systems–binaries, trinaries, and perhaps even more, even they should not be absolutely ruled out as settings for solar systems. After all, Pioneer X, on its pass by Jupiter, proved that what we thought was a very large planet may actually be a very small, cool sun.
Then there is the matter of a sun’s habitable zone. Regardless of size and temperature, there will be some orbital distance where a planet of the right size could maintain an atmosphere suitable for the evolution of life–that is, life as we know it, carbon-based, DNA-RNA replicating molecules. Nor should we exclude the possibility of life based on a different element or combination of elements. Silicon, methane, chlorine, all are possible life bases. I don’t think I’m being very original in proposing a law of organic optimism. “If life can arise, it will.” Some of the latest studies of Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, suggest that organic life may be in its earliest stages of evolution there. Certainly, plenty of organic molecules have been detected from space, even up to ethyl alcohol in free-floating clouds.
So that leaves us with a universe teeming with planets and crawling with life. What about intelligence? It abounds. On Earth alone we are now learning that Man has been sharing the planet with several other intelligent life forms–not very graciously–since the beginning. Bees, ants, termites, etc. show every evidence of hive mentalities maintaining stable cultures indefinitely, with elaborate architecture, social customs, and specialization of labor. Dolphins and whales of all species have larger and more convoluted brains than we do. They have given evidence of being able to learn our speech, and of having a distinct language of their own. Chimpanzees and gorillas have been taught a human-designed sign language that allows and facilitates simple conversations between men and apes. The grizzly bear has been seen to have even more problem-solving ability than do apes. I could go on with examples for quite a while. But despite our burgeoning knowledge of animal intelligence, we haven’t really succeeded in communicating effectively with any of the other intelligent life forms here on our own planet.
Man is set apart from other intelligence on this planet by his application of technology. For at least the past 12000 years, it has shaped us into what we are today. Give a culture of grizzly bears or raccoons adequate food, planetary dominance, and 12000 years to mess with technology, and you’d be surprised at what develops.
With so many different kinds and levels of intelligence here on one planet, just imagine how much there must be o ut there in the stars. A lot of it is going to be so alien we may never recognize it, may never be able to communicate with it, but some of it is going to be shaped by the law which states that similar caouse produce similar effects into alien races that we can relate to.
So, that is why the table on page 51 of Starfaring is havily weighted in favor of life, even of intelligent life. Logic demands that the universe be aswarm with every imaginable (and some that aren’t) form of life, and the sooner we get out to the stars, the sooner we’ll meet them. The point is: Designers of interstellar games are going to have to incorporate a lot of sheer alien strangeness in, if they hope to have any realism.
P.S. With the Viking lander sitting on Mars testing for micro-organisms, with more and more evidence coming to light from both science and mythology that Earth has been visited–possibly seeded–by alien intelligences, with never-ending u.f.o. reports steadily accumulating, it is unreasonable to assume human pre-eminence in the galaxy–either now or in the future. Star traveling races may be rare, but you can count on them being a lot more common than either Carl Sagan or The Good Doctor (i.e. Asimov) would admit. I regret that the tone of this article has been so wild and exuberant, but every statement I have made can be backed up by articles or programs in the everyday media of books and television. I should have footnoted all my claims, but I didn’t make a list of bibliographic entries as I was picking up this information piece by piece. I throw myself on the mercy and general informedness of all those likely to see this piece to compensate for my lack of rigor in presentation.
———Ken St. Andre
———Aug. 29, 1976
If you’re a fan of alien life, or if you’ve actually met aliens, please leave a comment.